<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><topicMap xmlns="http://www.topicmaps.org/xtm/1.0/" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<topic id="term">
<subjectIdentity>
<subjectIndicatorRef
xlink:href="http://www.techquila.com/psi/thesaurus/#term"/>
</subjectIdentity>
<baseName>
<baseNameString>Term</baseNameString>
</baseName>
</topic>
<topic id="broader-narrower">
<subjectIdentity>
<subjectIndicatorRef
xlink:href="http://www.techquila.com/psi/thesaurus/#broader-narrower"/>
</subjectIdentity>
<baseName>
<baseNameString>Broader Term-Narrower Term</baseNameString>
</baseName>
<baseName>
<scope>
<topicRef xlink:href="#broader"/>
</scope>
<baseNameString>Specialisations</baseNameString>
</baseName>
<baseName>
<scope>
<topicRef xlink:href="#narrower"/>
</scope>
<baseNameString>Generalisation</baseNameString>
</baseName>
</topic>
<topic id="broader">
<subjectIdentity>
<subjectIndicatorRef
xlink:href="http://www.techquila.com/psi/thesaurus/#broader"/>
</subjectIdentity>
<baseName>
<baseNameString>Broader</baseNameString>
</baseName>
</topic>
<topic id="narrower">
<subjectIdentity>
<subjectIndicatorRef
xlink:href="http://www.techquila.com/psi/thesaurus/#narrower"/>
</subjectIdentity>
<baseName>
<baseNameString>Narrower</baseNameString>
</baseName>
</topic>
<topic id="related-terms">
<baseName>
<baseNameString>Related Terms</baseNameString>
</baseName>
</topic>
<topic id="related-term">
<baseName>
<baseNameString>Related Term</baseNameString>
</baseName>
</topic>
<topic id="synonym">
<subjectIdentity>
<subjectIndicatorRef
xlink:href="http://www.techquila.com/psi/thesaurus/#synonym"/>
</subjectIdentity>
<baseName>
<baseNameString>Synonym</baseNameString>
</baseName>
</topic>
<topic id="preferred-term">
<subjectIdentity>
<subjectIndicatorRef
xlink:href="http://www.techquila.com/psi/thesaurus/#preferred-term"/>
</subjectIdentity>
<baseName>
<baseNameString>Preferred Term</baseNameString>
</baseName>
</topic>
<topic id="non-preferred-term">
<subjectIdentity>
<subjectIndicatorRef
xlink:href="http://www.techquila.com/psi/thesaurus/#non-preferred-term"/>
</subjectIdentity>
<baseName>
<baseNameString>Non-Preferred Term</baseNameString>
</baseName>
</topic>
<topic id="scope-note">
<subjectIdentity>
<subjectIndicatorRef
xlink:href="http://www.techquila.com/psi/thesaurus/#scope-note"/>
</subjectIdentity>
<baseName>
<baseNameString>Scope Note</baseNameString>
</baseName>
</topic><topic id="https://d4rpomm.ufuture.eu/tematres_d4r/vocab/xml.php?skosTema=351"><instanceOf><topicRef xlink:href="#term"/></instanceOf><baseName><baseNameString>Policy Cycle</baseNameString></baseName>  <occurrence>    <instanceOf>      <topicRef xlink:href="#scope-note"/>    </instanceOf><baseName><baseNameString><![CDATA[ <p>The policy cycle framework originates from the idea of organizing and ordering the complexity of policymaking. It is a heuristic tool through which different stages of the ongoing and never-ending dynamics of policy processes can be segmented and then analyzed.</p>
<p>The policy cycle – also called the “stages approaches to policy process” (De Leon, 1999) – does not have any explanatory relevance and is thus not at the theoretical core of public policy (where there is a richness of different theoretical frameworks). However, it is a powerful conceptual tool to simplify and make “workable” the complexity of policymaking.</p>
<p>Overall, it holds a relevant descriptive capacity that is still useful, despite many critics having underlined that it risks oversimplifying the interconnected and intertwined density of the policy process flux.</p>
<p>The cycle is usually divided into five stages:</p>
<ul>
<li>agenda setting,</li>
<li>formulation,</li>
<li>decision-making,</li>
<li>implementation, and</li>
<li>evaluation.</li>
</ul> ]]> </baseNameString></baseName>  </occurrence></topic></topicMap>