<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><mads xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mads/" xmlns:mods="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mads/
	mads.xsd"><authority><topic authority="https://d4rpomm.ufuture.eu/tematres_d4r/vocab/">Policy Cycle</topic></authority> <note xml:lang="en-EN">&lt;p&gt;The policy cycle framework originates from the idea of organizing and ordering the complexity of policymaking. It is a heuristic tool through which different stages of the ongoing and never-ending dynamics of policy processes can be segmented and then analyzed.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The policy cycle – also called the “stages approaches to policy process” (De Leon, 1999) – does not have any explanatory relevance and is thus not at the theoretical core of public policy (where there is a richness of different theoretical frameworks). However, it is a powerful conceptual tool to simplify and make “workable” the complexity of policymaking.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Overall, it holds a relevant descriptive capacity that is still useful, despite many critics having underlined that it risks oversimplifying the interconnected and intertwined density of the policy process flux.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The cycle is usually divided into five stages:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;agenda setting,&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;formulation,&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;decision-making,&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;implementation, and&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;evaluation.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt; </note> <note type="source" xml:lang="en-EN">&lt;p&gt;Capano, G., Pritoni, A. (2020). Policy Cycle. In: Harris, P., Bitonti, A., Fleisher, C., Skorkjær Binderkrantz, A. (eds) The Palgrave Encyclopedia of Interest Groups, Lobbying and Public Affairs . Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-13895-0_69-1&lt;/p&gt; </note></mads>