FCM Santander case - Revision history

AnnaRodeghiero: /* Cognitive Map Information */

2026-04-15T16:09:38Z

Cognitive Map Information

AnnaRodeghiero: /* Intermediate notes */

2026-04-15T16:06:30Z

Intermediate notes

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:06, 15 April 2026
Line 35:		Line 35:
	* '''Compound:''' Not applicable		* '''Compound:''' Not applicable
	* '''CAS:''' Not applicable		* '''CAS:''' Not applicable

	~~== Intermediate notes ==~~

	~~=== Unity of analysis ===~~

	The unit of analysis corresponds to the '''municipality of Santander'''. All decision-making and operational processes considered in the experiment take place within this perimeter.		The unit of analysis corresponds to the '''municipality of Santander'''. All decision-making and operational processes considered in the experiment take place within this perimeter.

Line 46:		Line 41:
	In this experiment, neither target contaminants nor corresponding NBS mitigation solutions were selected, because the objective is to define and explore the experimental process and path towards compliance with the new directive on urban wastewater treatment.		In this experiment, neither target contaminants nor corresponding NBS mitigation solutions were selected, because the objective is to define and explore the experimental process and path towards compliance with the new directive on urban wastewater treatment.

	=== Decision process flow ===		== Decision process flow ==

	The process examined is described according to the '''BPMN standard'''.		The process examined is described according to the '''BPMN standard'''.
Line 62:		Line 57:
	# Technical-political project		# Technical-political project
	# Experimentation and evaluation		# Experimentation and evaluation





Line 649:		Line 647:

	= Intervention Results =		= Intervention Results =
	''This section documents, in graphical and tabular form, the results of ~~your~~ interventions simulations.''		''This section documents, in graphical and tabular form, the results of the interventions simulations.''

	== Intervention Simulation Run #1 ==		== Intervention Simulation Run #1 ==

	=== Intervention Details ===		=== Intervention Details ===
	''This table shows the details of ~~your~~ intevention(s).''		''This table shows the details of the intevention(s).''
	{\| class="wikitable"		{\| class="wikitable"
	\|+		\|+
Line 1,078:		Line 1,076:


	==~~= Final~~ Notes ===
			== Notes ==
	''Below are the notes entered to document the second phase of our experiment (FCM modelling, simulation and intervention).''		''Below are the notes entered to document the second phase of our experiment (FCM modelling, simulation and intervention).''

AnnaRodeghiero: /* Implementation of the PoMM Module in the Pilot Sites – Santander (ES) */

2026-04-15T16:01:58Z

Implementation of the PoMM Module in the Pilot Sites – Santander (ES)

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:01, 15 April 2026
Line 1:		Line 1:
	= Implementation of the PoMM Module in the Pilot Sites – Santander (ES) =		= Implementation of the PoMM Module in the Pilot Sites – Santander (ES) =

	The primary local stakeholders actively participated in the testing of the PoMM module in Santander: ~~Mrs Belén Domínguez, Directora General de Medio Ambiente del Ayuntamiento de Santander and~~ Mrs Margarita Rojo, Primera teniente de alcalde y Concejala de Medio Ambiente y Servicios Técnicos del Ayuntamiento de Santander, Verónica Abascal, Directora del Servicio de AQUALIA en Santander, Marta Hernandez Zubieta: ~~responsable departamento~~ de redes de saneamiento. Additionally, prof. Jorge Rodriguez participated on behalf of the University of Cantabria and Mrs Andrea Camila Forero Ortiz on behalf of the partner AQUALIA.		The primary local stakeholders actively participated in the testing of the PoMM module in Santander: Mrs Margarita Rojo, Primera teniente de alcalde y Concejala de Medio Ambiente y Servicios Técnicos del Ayuntamiento de Santander and Mrs Belén Domínguez, Directora General de Medio Ambiente del Ayuntamiento de Santander; Verónica Abascal, Directora del Servicio de AQUALIA en Santander, Marta Hernandez Zubieta: Responsable Departamento de redes de saneamiento. Additionally, prof. Jorge Rodriguez participated on behalf of the University of Cantabria and Mrs Andrea Camila Forero Ortiz on behalf of the partner AQUALIA.

	Their active support was instrumental to the successful execution of this test.		Their active support was instrumental to the successful execution of this test.

AnnaRodeghiero: /* Impact of interventions on other observables */

2026-04-15T16:00:46Z

Impact of interventions on other observables

← Older revision	Revision as of 18:00, 15 April 2026
Line 1,184:	Line 1,184:


		{\| class="wikitable"
		\|+
		!
		!'''Proyecto de ciencia ciudadana para el monitoreo de CEs'''
		!'''Incentivos para la construcción privada que adopta SbN en zonas críticas'''
		!'''Transformación de una zona verde pública en SnB asignada a los ciudadanos para su mantenimiento'''
		\|-
		\|Beneficios-costes total EDAR Depuracion
		\|0.00%
		\|55.09%
		\|57.52%
		\|-
		\|Beneficios-costes total Gestor SII
		\|190.09%
		\|178.77%
		\|0.00%
		\|-
		\|Impacto CapEx OpEx EDAR Depuracion
		\|0.00%
		\|0.00%
		\|0.00%
		\|-
		\|Impacto CapEx OpEx Gestor SII
		\|0.00%
		\|343.95%
		\|0.00%
		\|-
		\|Impacto CapEx OpEx Otros Servicios
		\|0.00%
		\|32.35%
		\|20.50%
		\|-
		\|Impacto positivo sobre la capacidad de carga EDAR
		\|0.00%
		\|231.48%
		\|242.20%
		\|}

AnnaRodeghiero: /* Comparison Table */

2026-04-15T15:55:52Z

Comparison Table

@@ Line 1,072: / Line 1,072: @@
 | 0.00%
 |}
 '''Citizen science project for monitoring emerging contaminants''' comes out as a balanced approach that delivers gains across all dimensions, particularly in governance. It impacts on the Political Consensus Level, which more than doubles (+109.43%), based on the assumption that involving citizens in scientific monitoring creates a unifying force for policy. Technically, it also performs well, driving a 35.67% increase in System Capacity and improving the Municipality's Cost-Benefit ratio by 19.65%. It is the most "holistic" intervention, potentially bridging the gap between technical data collection (monitoring CEs) and social acceptance.
@@ Line 1,081: / Line 1,182: @@
 ==== Impact of interventions on other observables ====
 Based on the simulation results for the other observables, we can elaborate further on the impact of each interventio as follows.

AnnaRodeghiero: /* Comparison Table */

2026-04-15T15:47:53Z

Comparison Table

Show changes

AnnaRodeghiero: /* Intervention Simulation Run #1 */

2026-04-15T15:47:42Z

Intervention Simulation Run #1

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:47, 15 April 2026
Line 900:		Line 900:
	\| 0.100		\| 0.100
	\|}		\|}

			=== Comparison Table ===
			''This table shows the differences between the intervention(s) in relative terms (i.e., % increase or decrease) compared to the baseline.''

AnnaRodeghiero: /* Equilibrium Table */

2026-04-15T15:45:22Z

Equilibrium Table

Show changes

AnnaRodeghiero: /* Intervention Details */

2026-04-15T15:45:05Z

Intervention Details

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:45, 15 April 2026
Line 727:		Line 727:
	\|0.69		\|0.69
	\|}		\|}

			=== Equilibrium Table ===
			''This table shows the equilibrium values of state variables at baseline and intervention(s).''



	'''Citizen science project for monitoring emerging contaminants''' comes out as a balanced approach that delivers gains across all dimensions, particularly in governance. It impacts on the Political Consensus Level, which more than doubles (+109.43%), based on the assumption that involving citizens in scientific monitoring creates a unifying force for policy. Technically, it also performs well, driving a 35.67% increase in System Capacity and improving the Municipality's Cost-Benefit ratio by 19.65%. It is the most "holistic" intervention, potentially bridging the gap between technical data collection (monitoring CEs) and social acceptance.		'''Citizen science project for monitoring emerging contaminants''' comes out as a balanced approach that delivers gains across all dimensions, particularly in governance. It impacts on the Political Consensus Level, which more than doubles (+109.43%), based on the assumption that involving citizens in scientific monitoring creates a unifying force for policy. Technically, it also performs well, driving a 35.67% increase in System Capacity and improving the Municipality's Cost-Benefit ratio by 19.65%. It is the most "holistic" intervention, potentially bridging the gap between technical data collection (monitoring CEs) and social acceptance.

AnnaRodeghiero: /* Simulation results */

2026-04-15T15:34:27Z

Simulation results

Show changes